One of many classic films
was Jurassic Park which woke up our childhood dinosaur’s interest again. The
director Steven Spielberg and his especial effects team knew how put back our
feelings about dinosaurs reflecting it on the XXI cinema. A work of three
years, mixing paleontology, state-of-the-art technology and mastery gave them life
and credibility to these giant creatures.
What is the film about?
While the Park was finishing
the last details, the Park’s owner tries to convince to two greatest professors
of paleontology to get their approval and endorsement for the project. They and
a mathematic, financial assessor and the grandchildren of the Park’s owner get
involved in a fantastic adventure with the real danger of being the seized by
huge animals which had become extinct supposedly. Meanwhile, a staff technician
betrays them getting the embryos of the most famous fifteen species of the
Park. For disconnecting all the security systems, the island remains isolated
and unsafe, so that the rest of the staff will try to restart all the systems
and not be eaten to safe the other friends whom are dying little by little
because of the dinosaurs’ attacks.
The situation arrives in a
moment when the Park is truly unfeasible for to public open and stays isolated
for the world, the few survivors get to go out of the island almost safe. The
dinosaurs won the dominating human being’s fight.
Evolution theory vs. Creationism
How a common person who
believes above all in the word of God and the Bible could accept the idea that
dinosaurs had exist before the human being? And the human being is descendant
of monkeys and it was not a creation of the same image of God? Could Religion
and Science coexist?
The first truly descriptions
of dinosaurs go back to the 1820s thanks to the reverend William Buckland and
Gideon Mantell, however, in the century XIII the Italian monk Ristoro d’Arezzo
kept the argument that the sea shells found in the mountains could be carried
by the Flood, this idea was kept until the XVIII century. The Enlightenment had
had a movement with this idea where the leader was Leibniz, who defended it by
one reason: the hypothesis could make possible to find their origins in the
depths of the ocean, so that we could get the equivalence of the organic
fossils, for example the ammonites. To this idea follows several kinds of
speculations about the history of the Earth and the Flood. We have to say that
Leonardo de Vinci and Bernard Palissy were against to these arguments.
As says the Genesis, the
complete Creation, sky, land, seas, plants, animals and man lasted six days,
the Middle Age was faithfully fixed to this belief, but in the following
centuries, people tried to explain the time of the events of the Bible
analysing the land and the fossils founded. By the way, the Bible imposed a
narrow chronology which limited the hypotheses more radical. By then, what
happened with those giant animals which each day they were finding? Why some
fossils had no equivalence in that period? Are those huge animals disappeared
species? No way! In that case the Creation would not have being perfect, in
order to God could allowed to disappear a great part of his Creation. This
conclusion was another contradiction of the Christian dominant doctrine of that
period as many others. So, if God was creating each species of all kind of animals
and reptiles at the sixth day with the purpose that man can dominate and feed
himself by them, as we can see nowadays, it is almost impossible without fire
and iron weapons. Unthinkable if man has to fight with a huge dinosaur as a
Braquiosaurio or a Deinonychus, the true dinosaur which appears in the film as
a Velociraptor. But the main idea is that God could not create each kind of
species by a simple reason, the similarities between animals of different
species. Had got God time to create all those kind of different lives in one
day? How wonderful architect! To these conclusions arrived the first
palaeontologists, the first one was Georges Cuvier, who was moved by the
lectures of Buffon that he was the first man who had the intuition how huge is
the history of the Earth. So after discovering a new species of sea animal
which received the name of Cuvier, his studies were driving him to the fossils,
and later on to the zoology of the past in 1802. Then Jean-Baptiste de Monet
(Lamarck) established a classification that nowadays is accepted: some species
still exist, there is continuity, and some are different, the continuity of
life and their transformations. The idea of evolution has born here, in Philosophie zoologique (1809).
That is the evidence that life is developing until our days uninterruptedly.
But who is the true creator of biology evolution’s thought? The English
naturalist Charles Darwin, who with his studies about animal lives and the
evolution idea of Lamarck, he explains the mechanism of natural selection in The
Origin of Species (1859). The different reactions do not wait, some
scientists get his ideas and in other people sparked off a big indignation, and
later on, he published the Human Descendant (1871) where he includes the
human being near to monkey in the animal world, but Darwin knew the fossils
although he did not studied deeply, “too missing link” he said.
But, who invented the word
Dinosaur? Well, the famous British anatomist Richard Owen, during the annual
meeting British Association for the Scientist Progress celebrated in Plymouth
(1841), England; he defined these huge and rare animals as dinosaurs. In Greek deinos as dreadful and sauros: lizard in the sense of reptile,
because that word does not exist. Before giving us the term, he got the
conclusion this animals must not be in the same family either in the same order
of our reptiles. They are not crocodiles, either antiques lizards: they are
other reptiles which have the same particular anatomic characteristics of our
modern animals, so that they are dinosaurs. Owen was the most famous
paleontologist in the history, not only by the term, he discovered the anatomic
similarities between the animals of nowadays and then, and for that reason he
was the superintendent of the British Museum of Natural History in 1804 to
1892.
When the dreams come true
Before Steven Spielberg had thought
and realise his dinosaurs’ park, Richard Owen had have the real first park of
dinosaurs. The project carried out in 1854 when Owen is a British authority in
science. The park was inaugurated in Sydenham, London: the Crystal Palace, a
place where you can walk among dinosaurs, Ictiosaurus, Plesiosaurus... and all
kind of monsters imagined by Owen. One of the most famous picture of Owen is
the huge Iguanodon where inside has feast on the table for all his guests. However,
the image that Jurassic Park offers us is a fantastic place where we can fulfil
our dreams with real monsters; almost a circus. We should admit that the film
is pretty good, the special effects make real the images and also the
situation, a little bit soft from my point of view, but if this film could be
possible? If this idea, this project could be realised? Are we prepared for
this kind of park? Can the human being get all he wants?
We know we live in a
technologic age, where science and progress goes forward together and each day
the companies realise something new and unbelievable, although we still drive
in cars by oil. Furthermore, the sheep Dolly was cloned, but we do not really
know if a person has been cloned, science’s secrets. Nevertheless, if we could
imagine a real park with real dinosaurs, these would be his possible advantages
and disadvantages.
Advantages:
The investments could raise
a lot with the first dinosaur cloned; in the film’s example, they got complete
the dino DNA holes’ strand with the complete DNA of a frog. The dinosaur’s blood
could be got through the stuck mosquitoes in the ambers, which were fossilised
as dinosaur’s bones. Then, we would study how they really move, walk, run,
breath... a lot of theories could be pulled down seeing a real dinosaur.
When they will have got the
first one, they will want more, more species, more fantastic species, more
expensive projects, more famous and huger specimens. But which country would
discover the Pandora’s Box? Whatever country that discovers the secret will
increase their Treasury sing. The tourism will be the main investor, children
and full families, riches and not too riches, will visit each part of the park,
every day of the year.
The politics could make good
use of the great event to benefit from them. So that, the park would be a
perfect place of making money, the visitants will have rides, shops,
restaurants and its own kind of zoo. Everybody will want to go and will save
their money all the year to go to the Park, the only place of real fun. But now
we have brought back the dinosaurs, what we will do? Will we spread the species
around the world? We will leave dinosaurs live together with our animals? And
what about the people, the cities and villages safety? Will we be saved of
them?
Disadvantages:
As everybody wants, we want
to get a walk wherever and not being attacked, and less by a monster like a
dinosaur. So, to recuperate an extinct animal, like a dinosaur, is pretty
dangerous. We do not really know how intelligent they were, how they really
hunted, and less if they could be domesticated. As snakes or crocodiles, they
do not recognise his owner... then, if we have a dinosaurs’ Park, we would want
to have one for us. At this point enters the black market and rich people who
wants to show off of his new acquisition, a great dinosaur; the vicious circle
has begun...
We have not thought about
the organisations which try to protect the Nature, as Greenpeace. The fact of
bringing back dinosaurs to this age could be a fatal reaction on the mankind,
not only by the attack danger if one dinosaur breaks out of his area, it is
inhumane to try to domesticate an animal that was a king on the Earth in his
period, that born to be free and now relegated to be a pet. Nor all the technology
could make a past king to be a dog.
And the last disadvantage is
one of the most important reasons for to not realise that fantastic dream, the
past diseases: we do not have any example extracted of the dinosaurs’ bones, or
the mosquitoes in the ambers, so that the mankind is not prepare to face that
reality. We will not know if we are giving live again to an ill dinosaur which
could die of any sickness. So, it is better leave the ghosts rest and only to
imagine how they were and live, and maybe how it could be, as in Jurassic
Park’s film.
Dinosaurs: inspiration source
Almost to all of us, the
fascination by dinosaurs is not eternal but intense; it is limited by our
childhood. It usually comes when we have a scholar work or we get our first
book about them; soon, children learn all their unpronounceable names, their
physical aspects and also their feeding habits. Maybe we felt attracted by them
because of their gigantism, their grotesque skeletons’ appearance or a violent
and bloody kind of life, but the truth is dinosaurs has woke up our imagination
and fear since far past times.
Fantastic literature,
paintings, films, toys, have been the result of many mythological legends and
studies by many discovers of dinosaurs fossils, but now we have the best film
about dinosaurs. Best manifestation of our dreams as in plot as in realistic
representation of a dinosaur. Steven Spielberg put emphasis about trying to
give a realistic appearance to dinosaurs bringing a team of paleontologists,
drawers, and the best team of digital effects and animation. His purpose was
that when we see the film, we could believe that the dinosaurs which appear on
the screen were really real, so at the time to create their sounds, their roars
their movements they had to compare and create them from real animals. They
recorded a lot of types of sounds, a lot of types of animal reactions and
normal movements, etc. So, the background work was hard, Spielberg did not want
to commit the same mistake as the past films. Spielberg and his team spared no
expense to fulfil a real dream on our screens and give back the illusion and
old fascination about dinosaurs. And now, any film cannot compare him with the
saga Jurassic Park because Spielberg got that none have got.
So for the time being,
Jurassic Park is the best classic film about dinosaurs in the history of the
cinema.
Bibliography:
Barret, P. & J.L., Sanz.
2001 (1999). Larousse de los Dinosaurios del Inicio a la Extinción.
Barcelona: Spes Editorial, S.L.
Gayrard-Valy,
Y. 1989. Los Fósiles, Huellas de Mundos Desaparecidos. Madrid: Aguilar
Universal.
Microsoft
Encarta. 2006 (1993). Microsoft Corporation.
Ste.
Croix, P. (ed). 1992 (1985). Enciclopedia Ilustrada de los Dinosaurios. Susaeta
ediciones S.A.